Contact us

Iceland ICELAND 2016 - Greta Salome - Hear Them Calling

How do you rate the entry?

  • 12

    54 26.3%
  • 10

    41 20.0%
  • 8

    27 13.2%
  • 7

    25 12.2%
  • 6

    15 7.3%
  • 5

    11 5.4%
  • 4

    9 4.4%
  • 3

    9 4.4%
  • 2

    4 2.0%
  • 1

    4 2.0%
  • 0

    6 2.9%

  • Total voters
    205

Milos-BC

Well-known member
Joined
September 28, 2009
Posts
12,597
Location
Serbia
As I wrote yesterday

I expected more from Greta but it is good. Not fantastic, but good. I have a feeling like i heard it somewhere before as well. It is somewhere on the borderline for the final, I feel. It might pass from the position 8-10 and it may just miss out imo. First semi will almost certainly kill off some of the "sure qualifiers" and this is a contender.


This was expected. Although the song is ok, it is too formulastic and too generic, made exclusively for ESC public, while it probably got ignored by the wider audience. It did deserve to make it instead of Malta and Azerbaijan and she did perform it well, but as i said...........the outcome for me was not surprising and I saw it coming.
 

ag89

Well-known member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Posts
1,791
If you compare her staging in Iceland and now in Stockholm you can clearly see all these shadows, colours and nice camera angles (in Iceland). Her Eurovision performance was for me very strange because her staging was not good at all and all these shadows that should have transmitted the story of this song were not clear. Overall, it left a very strange impression for ordinary viewer I would say.

I never liked this song and expected it to flop, but after I saw her Eurovision performance for me it was quite obvious she won't go through.
 

ShoeFlo

Well-known member
Joined
January 23, 2013
Posts
9,218
Location
Oldenburg, Germany
It will remain one of the biggest mysteries of Eurovision History what Greta made actually wrong to finish behind SAN MARINO and MONTENEGRO. Jesus Christ :? xfacepalm
 

Edward

Active member
Joined
February 7, 2014
Posts
2,500
Location
Portugal
If Gabriela was the casualty of the final then Greta was the casualty of the whole edition. 14th only in her semi? Too strange.

I knew beforehand that Greta wasn't exactly popular with ESC fans following her also very strong (and very underrated) entry with Jónsi a few years ago. So I had the unfortunate feeling of non-qualification after her performance in the semi - but I wanted this feeling to be a lie until the very last minute. Clearly deserved a place in the final.

Don't know the exact reason for certain people picking up a bone with her (is it her personality? the fact she doesn't follow the modern standard of a pretty face?) but this year she had it all. Great staging, great lyrics...everything really. Not much one for staging visual effects but out of the songs that abused from effects this year it was the best in all aspects by miles and miles and the only one where these effects really added to the song. It really shall remain as a mystery.
 

Fluke

Well-known member
Joined
February 5, 2011
Posts
2,547
Location
Sweden
I think it was simply percieved as ripping off "Heroes" too much, plus the dark and mysterious staging didn't fit with the upbeat music.
 

cegs5

Well-known member
Joined
March 6, 2012
Posts
6,360
It will remain one of the biggest mysteries of Eurovision History what Greta made actually wrong to finish behind SAN MARINO and MONTENEGRO. Jesus Christ :? xfacepalm

San Marino and Montenegro were at least genuine... Iceland was too plastic and soulless, a factory entry made to please eurofans who are in the end a minority...and there were already some other plastic stuff which were catchier. Greta is also IMO a mediocre performer.
 

ShoeFlo

Well-known member
Joined
January 23, 2013
Posts
9,218
Location
Oldenburg, Germany
I thought you loved :sm: entry.

I did like :sm: 's entry when it was still a ballad ("love" is not an appropriate term though). However, when Serhat decided to perform the Disco version of this song I was disappointed cause I can't stand it. The live version on stage was an affirmation of my opinion, it was very bland.
 

ParadiseES

Well-known member
Joined
October 3, 2009
Posts
15,047
Location
Zaragoza (Spain)
This and the 3d televoting position for Poland are still the biggest mysteries to solve :confused:

I just can't find an answer.
 

martin

Well-known member
Joined
October 1, 2009
Posts
1,747
Don,t understand nothing. I was WOW when i see Iceland in semifinal 1. I was so happy and i,m was sure she was Slaying. Then she was not in top 10 and i was very unlucky with that and know only 14 :(

Greta is robbed xgaah
 

tuorem

Veteran
Joined
January 17, 2012
Posts
9,588
Location
GN-z11
Time for me to review the Icelandic entry :D

Greta Salome - Hear Them Calling
Status: It's a no no for me :geek: sorry

Song: I've recently realized that Iceland in Eurovision was a special country to me because - apart from songs I disliked from the start ("No Prejudice", "Unbroken") - pretty much all their efforts were faders on me: only "Never Forget" stood the test of time. In other words, Iceland is not a very interesting participant at the moment imo, it's not that I find their entries bad, but they aren't great either, and it's a shame because their artists have potential. So it was announced that Greta Salome would come back on Eurovision stage after sharing a song there with Jonsi in 2012, but this time, she would be alone and bring a rather different music style from her past effort. It's difficult to put a label on "Hear Them Calling" as it includes folk, classical and pop elements: it starts gently with a guitar and xylophone, but it suddenly gets really dramatic with the introduction of a fast-paced beat and male back vocals. Actually this seems to be the chorus, followed by an instrumental hook (I can't tell what instrument it is) and vocalises of the same melodic line. That part is supposed to be strong, impactful and catchy I guess, but I don't know why it reminds me of a random fun fair tune (which is not a good reference to me for a Eurovision entry), however it sounds kinda Icelandic, which is the only quality I find to it. The rest of the song is pretty much a copy and paste of the first minute, the bridge annoys me big time, the repetition is supposed to help build up, but I just find it uninspired and useless, an instrumental part would have been better to me. "Never Forget" was much much better in terms of composition and arrangements imo, whereas that efforts sounds half finished only: there were some good ideas but the final product didn't live up to my expectations. It even disappoints me that Greta, as a classically-trained musician, felt satisfied with it tbh. Anyway, putting the musical aspect aside, the biggest mistake was probably to go for the English version of the song. I'm sorry (not sorry) but I genuinely don't care if the song was originally written in English, the song seems to have an Icelandic feel to it: why not keep the mystery and beauty of your mother tongue too? This is not the first time their effort completely lost its charm and uniqueness anyway, someday I hope they'll understand that blending in doesn't always pay off. The lyrics deal with the positive and negative voices we all hear around us in our lives, as well as the decision not to listen to the negative ones while being positive towards others. It is indeed an interesting message to convey, but sadly the English lyrics didn't do it justice imo. Overall, I objectively recognize the thoughts put into the song, but unfortunately, it doesn't do anything to me when I listen to it: it's like water flowing over stones.

Voice: Greta is a better musician than she is a vocalist, still I guess she did a good job. Neither outstanding, nor bad, I believe she would have been more comfortable without her scenography, but that's another story. I'm not that fond of her voice, but that's just personal taste. Backing vocalists were nice.

Staging: Iceland went for a very visual performance. Greta started singing in the dark with only a spotlight above her head, then her silhouette was progressively lit. As she got down on her knees and began her dance routine, the LED floor displayed what seemed like a blue sky with black birds flying. During the chorus, giant hand shadows and human silhouettes appeared on the main backdrop, before turning into smoke. Then came a little trick that obliged Greta to walk towards the camera, so that her own silhouette in trompe l'oeil style wows people once it disappears. I admit that part was well done. Then the hands came back to reach her. All this visual work was of course nice to look at, BUT we've unfortunately seen that before and - at least for me - it didn't have the same impact. Yes, Mans didn't invent projectors, but it was kinda unseen the way it was used in 2015. Besides, Sergey performed earlier in the same "category". Also, I think the coldness and gloominess of the performance didn't fit the rather joyful mood of the song, it was mismatched imo. Apart from the visuals, the dance routine was too much for me. Overall, I think there was too many things going on, which distracted me from the song (yes, I heard it the first time during the semi and I couldn't remember anything about it before the recap was on), less is more tbh. As for her clothes, Greta wore a leather-like one-piece black outfit with fringes on her arms, shorts, tights and high boots: I didn't like the fringes, the rest was ok.

Outcome: With all the hype surrounding the song, I thought (like most people) that it would qualify (even though I don't like it), but Greta ended up being the Kate Ryan of 2016 since she has been ranked 13th with both juries and televoters. I'm not sure what didn't work, maybe performing after Russia (that had a similar staging) might have hurt them, maybe people didn't get the song, who knows? Personally, I found the performance quite rushed and surprisingly not memorable, it wasn't as effective and striking as in their NF. "Hear Them Calling" is 37th out of 42 in my personal ranking, the song goes nowhere to me and the beautiful backdrops couldn't make up for that. It's Heroes all over again: style over substance. Sorry Iceland, I never have truly rooted for you since I started watching Eurovision in 2009, but I'm hopeful that it'll change in the coming years: you have talented artists and composers with potential, now you have to find a song that is really solid. And think twice before opting for English lyrics, Icelandic is a beautiful language and it may add character to your entries: please learn from your mistakes! xpray See you next year!
 

Realest

Well-known member
Joined
May 23, 2017
Posts
7,786
Location
Germany
I still fail to understand to see what People saw in this. The Song itself is mixture of lots unfitting Pieces, in the End nothing Half and nothing Whole. And Herself has about the thinnest Voice in the World and the Performance is way too hectic. Juries and Televoter did a great Job putting this behind :me: and :sm:
 

Mainshow

Veteran
Joined
December 23, 2018
Posts
14,367
5 pts - I agree with the latest users above.
I didn't get the song either. It's just "average" to me... not unique enough to stand out and the whole song sounds so rushed and messy... like many elements were excellent but they strangely don't work in one song. Something just sounds off in terms of melody as well.
 
Top Bottom