ONLY! These brutes have posted to the official channel of the first run, which had problem with sound! And you heard the sound difference in the video??
THEY ARE DOING EVERYTHING THAT LOREEN IS NOT WON! (O)(O)(O)(O)
you must be freakin' kidding me....I'm not talking about the sound problem (which I don't hear,except the fact that I understand only 5-6 words from what she sings) but about the fact that eurovision.tv would so something like that....we've seen 36 rehearsals so far ( X2-the second rehearsal) and Sweden has the entire video uploaded -3:15 min where we can see the backdrop,the lights,the camerawork,the choreography,professional shots, how the stage looks, and another effects like snow.It's the best well-made rehearsal video from all countries.
you must be freakin' kidding me....I'm not talking about the sound problem (which I don't hear,except the fact that I understand only 5-6 words from what she sings) but about the fact that eurovision.tv would so something like that....we've seen 36 rehearsals so far ( X2-the second rehearsal) and Sweden has the entire video uploaded -3:15 min where we can see the backdrop,the lights,the camerawork,the choreography,professional shots, how the stage looks, and another effects like snow.It's the best well-made rehearsal video from all countries.
I don't like though how some other countries have like a little more than one minute,and they barely show something,it's more from backstage and some pictures.So if I doubted until now Loreen will win,after I saw this video and how it was made,I changed my opinion.
but maybe this is just my opinion.
It's realy easy, you just have to use a professionnal video server with JPEG compression. LSM, a belgian system, is able to do that since the late 80s. It's the same system used during sports events to show you replays. Here, you just have to use it in live. It will of course have a small delay, as it has to record and play back the video, but I will say it's less than 500 ms.
Are you for real? What's even worse than using a clip with bad sound, no snow and an overall bad rehearsal? Answer: using it for 3 minutes plus. It must have been better to use 1 (yes ONE) minute of the second rehearsal of the day since that had functioning sound AND snow. If this shows anything it's that the production will most likely suck at the second semi final, the sound will probably be worse, no snow, that horrible reverb effect again and on top of that crazy bad camera work.
oups I can't hide anymoreWe have an expert here! Thanks for the info, I was wondering about this as well.
you must be freakin' kidding me....I'm not talking about the sound problem (which I don't hear,except the fact that I understand only 5-6 words from what she sings) but about the fact that eurovision.tv would so something like that....we've seen 36 rehearsals so far ( X2-the second rehearsal) and Sweden has the entire video uploaded -3:15 min where we can see the backdrop,the lights,the camerawork,the choreography,professional shots, how the stage looks, and another effects like snow.It's the best well-made rehearsal video from all countries.
I don't like though how some other countries have like a little more than one minute,and they barely show something,it's more from backstage and some pictures.So if I doubted until now Loreen will win,after I saw this video and how it was made,I changed my opinion.
but maybe this is just my opinion.
Cyprus 1:47 !
Serbia 2:06
Iceland 2:06
Russia 1:28
What is it with the Swedish fans this year?