ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
It’s not more outdated than the average Melfest song this year.If this was Sweeden the public voting would have been ignord. In Sweden the danish entry is looked at as outdated
DR’s leader of Melodi Grand Prix after the show:
“We will analyse what kind of year it was in Eurovision and how we could have been stronger. This year there are a lot of freaky songs and we came with a more classic song. So we'll have to see how we move forward with something that might take Europe by storm next year.”
Doing like Ireland did this year? I don’t think that will happen. Melodi Grand Prix is a more established event than the Irish one, and the Danes are not ready for noisy freak shows. They are not as desperate as the Irish, so to speak.
DR is often criticised for picking the wrong songs for the Danish show, but I’ve seen little evidence that strong songs are left out.
In my opinion, Denmark should primarily focus on finding strong singers. Too often it’s inexperienced singers who are singing the best songs. We’ve seen Latvia qualifying with a mediocre song, but a good singer, and in the Danish contest, a similar boring song qualified for the final. In both cases the singer’s qualities made the difference despite very bad odds.
The question is if DR can find such a good artist? It’s difficult because there is a big risk of stigma when you participate at Melodi Grand Prix. More risk than reward.
Denmark hasn’t brought a strong singer to Eurovision since Anja Nissen. Some decent ones now and then, but not in the category of this year’s artists from Latvia, Serbia, France, Portugal and the likes. Add to this, that Denmark has had some good options in recent years, but those songs were not performed well enough to win. Cosmic Twins and Conf3ssion come to mind - bookmakers’ favourites, but the singers had zero experience and failed live. “Human” is another one of those great songs that fell apart on stage. It happens too often. And when finally there is a strong performer, he or she is let down by the Danes not appreciating a high artistic level and choosing something bland instead.I think beside getting a good song, can they at least get someone who CAN sing. I mean Latvia managed to qualify with that non-event of a song (with Dons basically carrying the song through). 4 NQs in a row, 3 of them could barely sing.
She was good, but not good enough. That happens sometimes.
Anyway now that Georgia AND Latvia AND Ireland reached the final, guess which country now has the longest ongoing NQ streak out of everyone?
To be fair, they had stopped importing Swedish songs for some years. Three entries written by Danes in a row, including one in the Danish language - none of them made it through from the semis despite a big variety of genres.Denmark's broadcaster needs to get a whole new Eurovision team and start relying on their own song writers and artists, and stop looking to Sweden for inspiration or trying to create 'Eurovision music'. Denmark's music scene has a lot of authentic, unique talent - it's time to connect with that.
With the "help" from the partially international jury, this song was picked instead of the televote favourite. Number three was a boring ballad like Latvia's.Obviously NQ. What was Denmark even thinking picking this
Denmark was 12th in the semi, just behind Czechia (!), with Norway being 10th and thus qualifying.
The supposed Swedish support didn't come. The Norwegians gave Denmark 10 points, Sweden gave 0. You can't say that Sweden supports Denmark anymore when it comes to voting. Not even when the song is written by Swedes as it was this year.
It's getting late and my brain has stopped working.Well, it´s difficult to get points from if they vote in a different semi.