Well that would be the dream scenario, but EBU won't let that happen, so to put the jury vote to 60/40 or 70/30 (with the public vote having upper hand) could be a compromise, but can't see that happen either unfortunately.
Oh, and of course, for the millionth time : RE-INTRODUCTION OF RANDOM STARTING ORDER DRAW!!!! I hate that EBU is so blatantly promoting lack of transparency (= corruption, cronyism, nepotism). I don't buy the argument that them choosing the starting order is to "create a more interesting show", like plenty of people pointed out already (including me, every year since this corrupted method got introduced!), there are ways to get a diverse show with just having some tempo or genre pots where entries are put in and THEN draw it randomly... c'mon it's not so hard to be creative unless you really don't want a transparent fair show!?
I second this comment.
My solution to juries it lowering down their percentage to 30%.
Always thought that's how it should be.
About random order, a similiar solution could be adopted.
Instead of two halves being determines by draw, they could make a draw for quarters, or even groups of 4, then the producer decides the order within these group of songs.
In the current situation, they have so much power. They basically killed the chances of Laura (
2016) and Imrı (
2017).
Laura was 3rd in semi and 10th in final, Imrı was 3rd in semi and 23rd in final
Just because they're uptempo songs they were put last in semi and first in finals.
All of us already knew they would be the first songs, right after it was known they would be in first half.