Contact us

What lessons did you learn from this years ESC?

lowyby

Active member
Joined
May 17, 2011
Posts
1,727
A lesson learnt: Azerbaijan CAN fail with bad vocals! (I'm refering to 2011 :p)
 

FilipFromSweden

Well-known member
Joined
March 27, 2012
Posts
6,667
You know, it's still hard to imagine that :az: won in 2011 with Running Scared and they ended up 22nd in 2014 with Start A Fire
 

Pawhlen

Active member
Joined
June 9, 2013
Posts
2,980
Location
Eksjö
You know, it's still hard to imagine that :az: won in 2011 with Running Scared and they ended up 22nd in 2014 with Start A Fire

They won because they did one thing they didn´t do this year. Something called "cheating and buying votes" xwhistle
 

DanielLuis

Well-known member
Joined
March 14, 2011
Posts
8,605
No, they won because the edition was weak, without a clear winner, and their song, being late in the draw and being the only favourite and contender that had a good draw, managed to stand out a bit more than the others and win.
 

Pawhlen

Active member
Joined
June 9, 2013
Posts
2,980
Location
Eksjö
No, they won because the edition was weak, without a clear winner, and their song, being late in the draw and being the only favourite and contender that had a good draw, managed to stand out a bit more than the others and win.

Then, explain to me why :at: won this year despite having a bad running number compared to :nl:? It´s the same thing, :nl: was together with :at:, :am:, :se: and :hu: the hottest favorites this year. :hu: had a good number too. xthink

The hype around the starting number you get is being overdramatic as hell :roll:

The only thing that matters is which songs you have before and after, not which number you get. :at:, :se:, :am: and :ua: finished in top 6 despite having "bad" starting numbers. That confirms that if you have a great song, it doesn´t matter which number you get.
 

FilipFromSweden

Well-known member
Joined
March 27, 2012
Posts
6,667
Then, explain to me why :at: won this year despite having a bad running number compared to :nl:? It´s the same thing, :nl: was together with :at:, :am:, :se: and :hu: the hottest favorites this year. :hu: had a good number too. xthink

The hype around the starting number you get is being overdramatic as hell :roll:

The only thing that matters is which songs you have before and after, not which number you get. :at:, :se:, :am: and :ua: finished in top 6 despite having "bad" starting numbers. That confirms that if you have a great song, it doesn´t matter which number you get.

Do you even need to ask why :at: won? There's a reason :at: won with almost 300 points.
Conchita is a symbol for LGBT rights and that everyone can be who they are, the song is about rising from hard times and be proud of who you are. Conchita also has a heart of gold and a really good voice. And after Russia making laws against LGBT Conchita obviously got a lot of votes by that.
 

Pawhlen

Active member
Joined
June 9, 2013
Posts
2,980
Location
Eksjö
Do you even need to ask why :at: won? There's a reason :at: won with almost 300 points.
Conchita is a symbol for LGBT rights and that everyone can be who they are, the song is about rising from hard times and be proud of who you are. Conchita also has a heart of gold and a really good voice. And after Russia making laws against LGBT Conchita obviously got a lot of votes by that.

But for god sake, I know why :at: won. I´m not stupid X-OI xgaah

I was asking DanielLuis how :at: managed to win with a bad running number (the whole fuss about that is quite pathetic).
 

DanielLuis

Well-known member
Joined
March 14, 2011
Posts
8,605
Then, explain to me why :at: won this year despite having a bad running number compared to :nl:? It´s the same thing, :nl: was together with :at:, :am:, :se: and :hu: the hottest favorites this year. :hu: had a good number too. xthink

The hype around the starting number you get is being overdramatic as hell :roll:

The only thing that matters is which songs you have before and after, not which number you get. :at:, :se:, :am: and :ua: finished in top 6 despite having "bad" starting numbers. That confirms that if you have a great song, it doesn´t matter which number you get.

Because the two situations are completely different. Austria clearly had an entry completely outstanding from the rest and would win in any running order, while in 2011 there was no outstanding entry and no standout song, which meant the running order actually played a much bigger role. If you ask me overdramatic is saying that Azerbaijan stole the victory in 2011, specially considering they didn't even win the jury voting.
 

Pawhlen

Active member
Joined
June 9, 2013
Posts
2,980
Location
Eksjö
Because the two situations are completely different. Austria clearly had an entry completely outstanding from the rest and would win in any running order, while in 2011 there was no outstanding entry and no standout song, which meant the running order actually played a much bigger role. If you ask me overdramatic is saying that Azerbaijan stole the victory in 2011, specially considering they didn't even win the jury voting.

Azerbaijan have been cheating buying televotes, not only jury votes, you know

I wonder why everyone, every year are still being overdramatic over which running number each country gets then? I´m pretty sure that :no:, :de:, :se: and :dk: would still have won in 2009, 2010, 2012 and 2013 even if they had an earlier starting position because they just like you said about :at: had acts that was spectacular
 

Mlyn

Banned
Joined
March 19, 2014
Posts
2,261
Location
.at
I recall Ireland winning with starting number 3 in 1994 and Turkey with number 4 in 2004.

Seems like years ending with the 4 are good for early starters :D
 

greece

Active member
Joined
January 7, 2014
Posts
4,877
If the song is great and deserve to win it will do it from any running order xshrug

But Azerbaijan maybe had a possitive running order, but this song was definately not a winning one
 

GRE

Well-known member
Joined
December 6, 2010
Posts
8,193
Location
Greece
:az: won the public voting 2 Points ahead of us back in 2011

No.
223 of Azerbaijan were all televoting points + San Marino voting.
San Marino jury gave 10 points to Azerbaijan and 6 to Sweden.
So the REAL televoting results are:
1.Sweden 215 points
2.Azerbaijan 213 points
 

greece

Active member
Joined
January 7, 2014
Posts
4,877
No.
223 of Azerbaijan were all televoting points + San Marino voting.
San Marino jury gave 10 points to Azerbaijan and 6 to Sweden.
So the REAL televoting results are:
1.Sweden 215 points
2.Azerbaijan 213 points

It is only two points xshrug And btw why all this discussion about Azerbaijan here? They flop this year,they won at 2011. Deserved or not the did it
 

Mlyn

Banned
Joined
March 19, 2014
Posts
2,261
Location
.at
That a song can curse a winning team -- Dancing in the rain.....
 

dragvision

Banned
Joined
November 24, 2011
Posts
997
Location
Parma
the lesson is eurovision is no all dead, the new news , the music company in no and swe leave the eurovision, cause the rigt goes all at the universaL
 

Pawhlen

Active member
Joined
June 9, 2013
Posts
2,980
Location
Eksjö
the lesson is eurovision is no all dead, the new news , the music company in no and swe leave the eurovision, cause the rigt goes all at the universaL

To say that :no: and :se: will leave because of that is like saying that :sm: will win the World Cup in football, very very unlikely
 

Mlyn

Banned
Joined
March 19, 2014
Posts
2,261
Location
.at
I don't have PED
 
Top Bottom