EurovisionSmile
Veteran
Re: WLSC 39 - The beauty of Nations - Results show tonight (11th April--20:00 CET)
Mozz
Mozz
Omg, ninth for SR Indiria! It's sad that it's more than expected. Thanks to all voters.
Wow, now I fear for the future of NSC. But I'm mostly surprised by the one who sent it, after previously discussing the originality of some nations. Well done Mozz you surpassed Paper's point record and became the first one to score a fourth win. Congrats! Well when it comes to song, it is one of the most irritating songs ever, and it was last in my list.
I think you misunderstood me. When I made jokes about Smileyland sending overplayed songs and that he could send Adele or Coldplay in the next edition that was because Smileyland is sending overplayed, famous songs in every edition.
My Immortal is one of the very few songs that I sent that are famous overplayed songs. Just take a look at my list.
I'm wasn't thinking of overplayed songs only, but NSC entries as well... I thought all of you WLers are careful when it comes to that like Fofo. But I'm not saying it's a bad thing, imo it's better to use something you like and that can't be used once you enter NSC. Although repeating the same songs is kinda boring.
Wow, now I fear for the future of NSC.
You wrote this ^.
It was obvious to me that you were fearing the future of NSC because of your perceived lack or originality of songs in WLSC.
It was meant for the taste of the people (WLers) that obviously isn't close to mine, not to the entry you sent or your intentions in future.
Wow, now I fear for the future of NSC. But I'm mostly surprised by the one who sent it, after previously discussing the originality of some nations. Well done Mozz you surpassed Paper's point record and became the first one to score a fourth win. Congrats! Well when it comes to song, it is one of the most irritating songs ever, and it was last in my list.
Then why did you write "after previously discussing the originality of some nations"?
Those two posts of mine are not connected in any way.
It doesn't read that way at all....
You wrote "Wow, now I fear for the future of NSC. But I'm mostly surprised by the one who sent it, after previously discussing the originality of some nations."
To me, you were clearly criticizing (your perceived) lack of originality in WLSC. You can't ust put A and b right next to each other and then say "oh, A and B have nothing to do with each other, I meant C". Bue where is C in that post? You suddenly showed C in a new post.
A: You're right, totally right. I admit that I have multiple personas in me that make me change my mind every now and then. You can keep analysing my posts in PM if you wish because this discussion has gone too far. hihi
Blablabla
Blablala
(superfluous unimportant stuff)
[TO BE CONTINUED...]
That suffices.