As I said,imo,we need one more poll for this but just with two options : 1 person jury and 2 or more people jury
Why? Because the winning option doesn't suit your needs? :?
As I said,imo,we need one more poll for this but just with two options : 1 person jury and 2 or more people jury
The "1 jury option" won with 12 votes, limitless had 11 votes, and limited had 10 votes. I see one winner here, and the next question was about what would happen IF the "limited" option won.
Why? Because the winning option doesn't suit your needs? :?
NONO
Hele explained it already.
Oh gosh both drama queens, AdelAdel is right.
One question : Why are you not for another poll,you're afraid that one person jury will lose?
"The 1 jury" option had 12 votes, "Multiple" jury option had 21 votes. If poll was different organized it could be question like this: Do you prefer 1 jury option or multiple jury option? Next question could be: If you answered multiple jury option, would you like it to be limited or limitless? And last question should be what would happen IF the "limited" option won.
What the heck? :? There were 3 options and each one wasn't connected to the other, you can't just combine 2 options like that, it doesn't make any sense.
It makes sense because multiple options are connected by word "multiple". There is more people for multiple jury, some want it limited and some want it limitless, but in the end, more people want multiple jury.
But I really do not think discussing and explaining over and over again. I think I was clear with my point of seeing and it is up to mods to decide what they will do about this question.
I feel like my idea has been ignored
And wow didn't expect such a turn out for this poll :O
"The 1 jury" option had 12 votes, "Multiple" jury option had 21 votes. If poll was different organized it could be question like this: Do you prefer 1 jury option or multiple jury option? Next question could be: If you answered multiple jury option, would you like it to be limited or limitless? And last question should be what would happen IF the "limited" option won.
Why are some of you against a 2nd poll? Yes, 1 member jury option won but technically majority want multiple juries. It can't be too hard to see NSCers should stop trying to turn this contest into NSC 2.
Hele's idea seems logical.
One option is one option - stop arguing with the official results, already :?
Why are some of you against a 2nd poll? Yes, 1 member jury option won but technically majority want multiple juries. It can't be too hard to see NSCers should stop trying to turn this contest into NSC 2.
Hele's idea seems logical.
Sorry about that, I didn't intentionally leave that out. I make mistakes, as a lot of you guys have seen in the forum.