Had the jury been there in previous years... (1998-2008)

[Michelangelo]

I don't thing that Helena could won over the Amaizing ballad of Chiara if the jury was there.

Me neither. I'm pretty sure Chiara would have been the jury's favourite. And rightly so, that song together with her performance was outstanding.

 

[JackBauer]

I just realized that with 50/50 Greece would have got only 8 points in 1998, that's tell you how bad that entry was

 

[94ayd]

2007 - Serbia still the winner..¡¡¡
Runner ups: Russia, Belarus
Top 5: Bulgaria, Georgia

The Semis where: Iceland, Belarus, Slovenia, Hungary, Serbia, Moldova, Latvia, Turkey, Portugal & Georgia

Have lost in semi-finals: Macedonia

How come your predict Bulgaria would've been top 5 but then we don't even qualify, according to you.

 

[Sabiondo]

How come your predict Bulgaria would've been top 5 but then we don't even qualify, according to you.

Upsss i fogot add us at the list , was a very competitive year

 

[EurovisionSmile]

I don't thing that Helena could won over the Amaizing ballad of Chiara if the jury was there.

Really? So that means that it was actually a good thing having only the televote to decide the winner in 2005

 

[FilipFromSweden]

In 2008 would never , ever have won. Believe me , portugal had been in top 5 thanks to the jury and Sweden to , because they were the jury wild-card. I think Greece , Armenia or Norway would have won thanks to jury


In 2007 would still have been the true winner as they are , jury would have loved it. Dough i believe Ukraine would be like placed nr 8 in the final and Hungary nr 2.

In 2006 , would never have won , i think , or had been the winner.

I both like and unlike jury , jury always have sutch strange taste , i mean , ITALY? LITHUANIA? and what the hell , how the hell was it possible that the jury did not stop Moldova 2011? Still , jury always drag down Russia but jury never like Sweden that much.

 

[FilipFromSweden]

Can you guys/girls tell me where you get this '' what if '' jury votes?