We'll have a better idea about his qualification chances once we have all the songs. He's certainly not hopeless, but hardly a guaranteed qualifier either. If he really does flop... all those people voting for Uku because he deserved a consolation prize or they felt sorry for him really should have waited until he had a more competitive song.
Now his heard-earned long-awaited time in the spotlight may end much sooner than it could have, with a less than glorious result. Imagine trying all those years over and over just to unceremoniously flop out in the semi when you finally get there. I guess he and Laura can start a support group if that happens, share their similar experiences. Or maybe Kirkorov can slip some juries a buck or two to help him reach the final at least. Wonder what their staging plans will be and if we'll hear about them before May.
On the bright side, if he
does flop and more unique songs end up doing well instead, maybe Tomi & our local 'eurovision experts' will take a hint and aim for some more varied songs. Won't mean our televoters will pick anything unique in the end, but would make for a cooler lineup at least.
One way to decrease the power of televote would indeed be to do away with the superfinal.
That would be a really drastic change tho', and cost them a lot of voting bucks.
But as long as the superfinal stays, juries are almost pointless. Having no SF would have changed quite a few winners over the years..
2010 - Lenna
2014 - Super Hot Cosmos Blues Band
2017 - Kerli
2019 - Stefan
2020 - Jaagup
Most of the winners televote picked those years were flops, with only Victor reaching the final & Uku as of yet unknown. No guarantee any of the jury winners would have done any better, but we certainly can't say "juries would have killed our top 10 song, televoters were right!".
Unless Uku finishes top 10 this year, but that's not particularly likely.
But anyway, I somehow doubt they'll do away with the superfinal. Too lucrative.