LalehForWD
Active member
Not sure I agree with this either. It pretty much tells participating countries that want to qualify each year but not necessarily win - which is a lot of them - "You only have to try every second year." That really doesn't seem like it'd help with the quality of songs at the contest. Plus, it's a system that'd make it difficult to break from past trends. Just say you've got a country that traditionally struggles to qualify - Macedonia, the Czech Republic, San Marino, etc. - and one year they send a good song, one that'd usually get them a qualification in one of the lower spots. However, another country that sent a hit in the previous year ends up sending a massive turd, which then takes the qualification spot from the otherwise-successful country using its free points and some regional votes. Not exactly ideal.
I understand that the current Big 5 system works something like this already by lowering the number of qualification spots in a less direct way, but changing the system in this way spreads the unfair advantage to influence even more countries, makes it difficult to reverse trends, and would more clearly highlight any unfairness, leading to additional anger (as with the current system you at least can't blame any one auto-qualifier for the failure of a semi-final entry, whereas with these changes you could). Just my two cents.
It depends very much how the bonus points would be decided. Say 2 extra 12 points for the previous winner, one or two extra 10 points for the runner up etc. Just to honour the previous achievement, not necessarily cement a permanent ranking. Countries repeatedly struggling to qualify like Bulgaria, the Czechs and Slovaks wouldn't be hindered by that, on the contrary the number of open final slots available for them would increase by 5.