ESC United Mod Team
Super Moderator
- Joined
- February 10, 2021
- Posts
- 214
It‘s never too late to show good taste!Is it too late to give her a ? This is one of the songs that just feels so special this season.
20 minutes, le parisien and all this kind of famous information websites are not references at all, people in the comments are always mad about everything (at leats It was when I read only once the comments a few years ago). More generally I see lots of positive comments on social networks like "it is better than last year", "it's quite good for once", and things like that.Je parle en privé + sur des sites d'information non Eurovision style 20 Minutes (car c'est celui de Fabien Randanne qui suit le concours) mais il y en a aussi d'autres. Sur 20 Minutes en tout cas, il y a des ces commentaires, c'est purement affligeant. Même mon chien est bien mieux élevé.
Bref back to english now.
That swedish win in 1991 should have been reviewed again, or honestly, they should have just given both countries the victory. They tied in a voting system that was designed to not have ties, but that was just another one of the many disasters in rome that night. France deserved that win more than sweden in my opinion, the song was pure art.Give France the sixth win, review the 1991 tabulations also and give them their deserved 7th and let Sweden go mad.
Well we all know there will be at least a projection of the Eiffel tower as usually, most likely to be zoomed out when she's singing "La Grande France"We already know La Zarra will be alone on stage at Liverpool, confirmed by ARA.
This part taken from "20 Minutes":
“For the first time”, the delegation, which requested a decorator, also called on the services of a director of photography to design the three minutes of the performance. “We wanted to surround ourselves with lots of trades to do a big light show”, underlined the head of delegation to the podcast.
Link to the "12 points" podcast >> HERE
100000% agree the fact that Sweden won because they got more higher points instead of France having points from more countries has always confused the hell out of meThat swedish win in 1991 should have been reviewed again, or honestly, they should have just given both countries the victory. They tied in a voting system that was designed to not have ties, but that was just another one of the many disasters in rome that night. France deserved that win more than sweden in my opinion, the song was pure art.
They had the same amount of 12 points and 10 points if I remember correctly. They should honestly always give it to the country with the highest average score, not just counting the top ten in case of a tie.100000% agree the fact that Sweden won because they got more higher points instead of France having points from more countries has always confused the hell out of me
If I'm not mistaken, the current tiebreak rule is the more country gave you points = you win.100000% agree the fact that Sweden won because they got more higher points instead of France having points from more countries has always confused the hell out of me