Results with the 50/50 system used in 2013-2015

[Pawhlen]

Here are the results for the final this year using the 50/50 system used 2013-2015:

1. 333
2. 262
3. 223
4. 213
5. 166
6. 148
7. 142
8. 94
9. 92
10. 88
11. 87
12. 85
13. 83
14. 74
15. 72
16. 64
17. 52
18. 38
19. 37
20. 28
21. 24
22. 23
23. 20
24. 18
25. 17
26. 11

https://scorewiz.eu/scoreboard/view/221084/eurovision-song-contest-2018-5050-system-2013-2015

 

[Ezio]

This system was terrible and only survived 3 years, but it brought us zero points instead of 43 points in 2015 and make us look like the worst host ever, although Ukraine and Portugal scored less. Meh!!

 

[Pawhlen]

This system was terrible and only survived 3 years, but it brought us zero points instead of 43 points in 2015 and make us look like the worst host ever, although Ukraine and Portugal scored less. Meh!!

I agree, this is the worst system used in modern time, if EBU still would have used a convert 50/50 vote, they should have stucked to 2009-2012. But the system used now since 2016 is the most fair one since no points are being dropped or converted away

 

[Pawhlen]

I found out that I calculated even this system wrong, the real results is now updated in first post

the big difference in countries results when comparing 09-12 system with 13-15 system this year is

With 09-12 system: would have been 18th with 57p
With 13-15 system: would have been 8th with 94p

 

[hrcgfd]

I believe San Marino would use only jury votes in 50/50 system as they always did and it's great because they could help Slovenia and Sweden with their points.

 

[Mainshow]

The system 13-15 was utter shit.

I mean, I like seeing Ireland ending up Top 10 but seriously.. by taking this as an example, one can see how "unjustified" most ranks compared to the individual televoting and jury scores.

That system killed Igranka

 

[Alaska49]

this system was HOOOOOORRIBLE but spain being last should have happened for real